And also tolerate a 0 value for full move number.
Revert BUG_41 patch, now we set initial King file only
if a castling is possible, so we don't need the fix
anymore in case of correct FEN.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
We miss to account as a capture a promotion capture !
Incredible bug in this critical function that is here
since a long time (b50921fd5c of 21/10/2009 !!)
This patch fixes the bug and readds the faster
move_is_capture_or_promotion() that slightly increases
overall speed.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
This trivial change gives an impressive 2,5% speedup !!!!
Also retire one unused move_gives_check() overload.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
It seems much worst in number of nodes seacrhed to reach
the depth and anyhow does not give any advantage to the
Onno's oroginal one.
So revert by now and perhaps readd when we find something
clearly better.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
After 12613 games at 20"+0.1 on QUAD
Mod vs Orig 1870 - 1863 - 8880 ELO +0 (+- 3.3)
So no performance change but it is a code semplification
and also is more easy to understand.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Here the idea is to test probcut not only after bad
captures, but after any bad move, i.e. any move that
leaves the opponent with a good capture.
Ported by a patch from Onno, the difference from
original version is that we have moved probcut after
null search.
After 7917 games 4 threads 20"+0.1
Mod vs Orig: 1261 - 1095 - 5561 ELO +7 (+- 4.2) LOS 96%
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
We disjoint pseudo legal detection from full legal detection.
It will be used by future patches.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
When we are in check and we move the king then testing with
pl_move_is_legal(m, pinned) is not enough becuase we cannot
rely on attackers_to() but we have to explicitly remove the
king form the occupied bitboard to catch as invalid moves like
b1a1 when opposite queen is on c1.
Our move generator already produces correct evasions so we
just need to add the extra verification to move_is_legal().
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
It is interesting the fact that we need to test for
move_is_castle(m) anyway and not relying on testing
if destination square is attacked. Indeed the latter
condition fails if the castling rook is attacked,
castling is coded as "king captures the rook" but it
is legal in that case.
Verified no functional change with beginning of the series.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
The structure of move is changed so should also the two
functions. It happens that it works by accident !
Bug spotted by Marek Kwiatkowski
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
It seems we have a lot of totally useless code !
After 8577 games 1504 - 1451 - 5622 ELO +2 (+- 4.4)
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Also let do_setup_move() don't reuse same StateInfo so that
we can remove the check about different StateInfo objects
before memcpy() in do_move.
Functional change due to harmless additionals
do_move() / undo_move() steps.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Keep the isChess960 flag inside Position so that is
copied with the Position, but esplicitly highlight the
fact that a FEN string has not enough information to detect
Chess960 in general case. To do this add a boolean argument
isChess960 to from_fen() function so to self document this
shortcoming of FEN notation.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Introduced by me in before 1.9 and found by Tord that says:
The 'isChess960' slot in the 'Position' class is currently
set depending on the initial files of the rooks, and not on the value
of the UCI_Chess960 parameter. This is incorrect, as there are lots of
Chess960 positions where the rooks start on the usual files. As a
consequence (unless I am missing something), Stockfish will occasionally
output castling moves as e1g1/e1c1 rather than the correct e1h1/e1a1 format
in Chess960 games. It is possible that some or even most GUIs are robust
enough to accept both notations, but I wouldn't bet on it. And in any case,
Stockfish's behavior clearly violates the protocol.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Marco Costalba