mirror of
https://github.com/opelly27/Stockfish.git
synced 2026-05-20 16:47:37 +00:00
Don't prune discovered checks
Don't prune and eventually extend check moves of type DISCO_CHECK (pun intended, Lucas will understand :-) ). Patch from Lucas Braesch that has also tested it: Result: 879-661-2137, score=52.96%, LOS=100.00% (time 10"+0.1") I have started a verification test right now. bench: 6004966
This commit is contained in:
+7
-3
@@ -483,7 +483,8 @@ namespace {
|
||||
Depth ext, newDepth;
|
||||
Value bestValue, value, ttValue;
|
||||
Value eval, nullValue, futilityValue;
|
||||
bool inCheck, givesCheck, pvMove, singularExtensionNode;
|
||||
CheckType givesCheck;
|
||||
bool inCheck, pvMove, singularExtensionNode;
|
||||
bool captureOrPromotion, dangerous, doFullDepthSearch;
|
||||
int moveCount, playedMoveCount;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -815,7 +816,7 @@ split_point_start: // At split points actual search starts from here
|
||||
if (PvNode && dangerous)
|
||||
ext = ONE_PLY;
|
||||
|
||||
else if (givesCheck && pos.see_sign(move) >= 0)
|
||||
else if (givesCheck && (givesCheck == DISCO_CHECK || pos.see_sign(move) >= 0))
|
||||
ext = ONE_PLY / 2;
|
||||
|
||||
// Singular extension search. If all moves but one fail low on a search of
|
||||
@@ -882,6 +883,7 @@ split_point_start: // At split points actual search starts from here
|
||||
|
||||
// Prune moves with negative SEE at low depths
|
||||
if ( predictedDepth < 2 * ONE_PLY
|
||||
&& givesCheck != DISCO_CHECK
|
||||
&& pos.see_sign(move) < 0)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (SpNode)
|
||||
@@ -1102,7 +1104,8 @@ split_point_start: // At split points actual search starts from here
|
||||
Key posKey;
|
||||
Move ttMove, move, bestMove;
|
||||
Value bestValue, value, ttValue, futilityValue, futilityBase;
|
||||
bool givesCheck, enoughMaterial, evasionPrunable, fromNull;
|
||||
CheckType givesCheck;
|
||||
bool enoughMaterial, evasionPrunable, fromNull;
|
||||
Depth ttDepth;
|
||||
|
||||
ss->currentMove = bestMove = MOVE_NONE;
|
||||
@@ -1234,6 +1237,7 @@ split_point_start: // At split points actual search starts from here
|
||||
if ( !PvNode
|
||||
&& (!InCheck || evasionPrunable)
|
||||
&& move != ttMove
|
||||
&& givesCheck != DISCO_CHECK
|
||||
&& type_of(move) != PROMOTION
|
||||
&& pos.see_sign(move) < 0)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user