mirror of
https://github.com/opelly27/Stockfish.git
synced 2026-05-20 08:37:44 +00:00
Restore PorbCut name
Actually MultiCut is too different from current scheme. Note that neither ProbCut is exactly what we do because we try just a handful of captures instead of all moves, nevertheless it seems more in line with what we do. Suggested by Joona. No functional change.
This commit is contained in:
+1
-1
@@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ namespace {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Step 9. Multi-Cut (skipped when in check)
|
||||
// Step 9. ProbCut (skipped when in check)
|
||||
// If we have a very good capture (i.e. SEE > seeValues[captured_piece_type])
|
||||
// and a reduced search returns a value much above beta, we can (almost) safely
|
||||
// prune the previous move.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user